RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro FX 1000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 1000 with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FX 1000
2003
128 MB DDR2
0.08
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
35.57
+44363%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms FX 1000 by a whopping 44363% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1553163
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data55.09
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV30AD107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date21 January 2003 (23 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speed300 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2115 MHz
Number of transistors125 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400203.0
Floating-point processing powerno data12.99 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs896
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 1000 0.08
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 35.57
+44363%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 1000 34
Samples: 6
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 14817
+43479%
Samples: 2203

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.08 35.57
Recency 21 January 2003 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 44363% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1000 is a workstation graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 228 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1000 or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.