H200 NVL vs Quadro CX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking915not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency1.17no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Hopper (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGT200BGH100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date11 November 2008 (17 years ago)18 November 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19216896
Core clock speed602 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate38.53942.5
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPS60.32 TFLOPS
ROPs2424
TMUs64528
Tensor Coresno data528
L1 Cacheno data33 MB
L2 Cache192 KB50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB141 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit6144 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s4.89 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.39.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2008 18 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 141 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 600 Watt

Quadro CX has 300% lower power consumption.

H200 NVL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 9300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro CX and H200 NVL. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro CX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 44 votes

Rate H200 NVL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro CX or H200 NVL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.