RTX A3000 Mobile vs Quadro 7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 7000 Quadro Plex 7000 C2075 C2090 M2075 M2090 X2070 X2090
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A3000 Mobile A3000 Mobile 12 GB A4000 Max-Q A4000 Mobile A4500 Embedded A4500 Max-Q A4500 Mobile A5000 Max-Q A5000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 7000 with RTX A3000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 7000
2012, $14,499
6 GB GDDR5, 204 Watt
8.41

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms 7000 by a whopping 259% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking557213
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.1933.31
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF110GA104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date2 May 2012 (14 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124096
Core clock speed651 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1230 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate41.66157.4
Floating-point processing power1.3322 TFLOPS10.08 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs64128
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L1 Cache896 KB4 MB
L2 Cache768 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed851 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth163.4 GB/s264.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.08.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 7000 8.41
RTX A3000 Mobile 30.16
+259%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 7000 3505
Samples: 2
RTX A3000 Mobile 12566
+259%
Samples: 1318

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
−274%
101
+274%
1440p12−14
−317%
50
+317%
4K12−14
−275%
45
+275%

Cost per frame, $

1080p537.00no data
1440p1208.25no data
4K1208.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+0%
77
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+0%
66
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 53
+0%
53
+0%
Dota 2 142
+0%
142
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 124
+0%
124
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 151
+0%
151
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
+0%
43
+0%
Dota 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+0%
61
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+0%
62
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 49
+0%
49
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 77
+0%
77
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Quadro 7000 and RTX A3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 274% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 317% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 275% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.41 30.16
Recency 2 May 2012 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 70 Watt

RTX A3000 Mobile has a 259% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 191% lower power consumption.

The RTX A3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 7000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 7000 is a workstation graphics card while RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
vs
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
FirePro M5100 FirePro M5100
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
Quadro 3000M Quadro 3000M
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
K5000 SYNC Quadro K5000 SYNC
vs
RX 9060 XT 16 GB RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
NVS 310 NVS 310
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
GTX 745 OEM GTX 745 OEM
NVS 300 NVS 300
vs
NVS 120M NVS 120M
NVS 300 NVS 300
vs
NVS 110M NVS 110M
NVS 300 NVS 300
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 10 votes

Rate Quadro 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 204 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 7000 or RTX A3000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.