GeForce GTX 460M vs Quadro 7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 7000 Quadro Plex 7000 C2075 C2090 M2075 M2090 X2070 X2090
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 445M GT 555M GT 555M 3 GB GTX 460M GTX 460M SLI GTX 470M GTX 470M SLI GTX 480M GTX 480M SLI GTX 485M GTX 485M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 7000 with GeForce GTX 460M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 7000
2012, $14,499
6 GB GDDR5, 204 Watt
8.41
+186%

7000 outperforms 460M by a whopping 186% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
GTX 460M GTX 460M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking559830
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.194.55
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF110GF106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2 May 2012 (14 years ago)3 September 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512192
Core clock speed651 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6621.60
Floating-point processing power1.3322 TFLOPS0.5184 TFLOPS
ROPs4824
TMUs6432
L1 Cache896 KB256 KB
L2 Cache768 KB384 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed851 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth163.4 GB/s60.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 API with Feature Level 12.1
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 7000 8.41
+186%
GTX 460M 2.94

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 7000 3505
+187%
Samples: 2
GTX 460M 1223
Samples: 844

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p85−90
+183%
30
−183%
Full HD100−110
+163%
38
−163%

Cost per frame, $

1080p144.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how Quadro 7000 and GTX 460M compete in popular games:

  • Quadro 7000 is 183% faster in 900p
  • Quadro 7000 is 163% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.41 2.94
Recency 2 May 2012 3 September 2010
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1536 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro 7000 has a 186% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 460M, on the other hand, has 308% lower power consumption.

The Quadro 7000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 7000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 460M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
GTX 460M GeForce GTX 460M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
K5000 Mac Edition Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
vs
RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation
NVS 310 NVS 310
vs
FX 3000 FX 3000
NVS 310 NVS 310
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile
NVS 310 NVS 310
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
HD 7590M HD 7590M
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
i740 8 MB 8 MB
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
HD 6250 IGP HD 6250 IGP
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
9500 GS Rev. 2 GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 10 votes

Rate Quadro 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 83 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 7000 or GeForce GTX 460M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.