GeForce GT 220M vs Quadro 7000

Place in the ranking	556	1311
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.19	2.76
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	GF110	G96C
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	2 May 2012 (14 years ago)	15 June 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$14,499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	32
Core clock speed	651 MHz	500 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	314 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	204 Watt	14 Watt
Texture fill rate	41.66	8.000
Floating-point processing power	1.3322 TFLOPS	0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	8
TMUs	64	16
L1 Cache	896 KB	no data
L2 Cache	768 KB	32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-II
Length	248 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	851 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	163.4 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.0	1.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 7000 8.41
+1582%

GT 220M 0.50

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 7000 3505
+1593%

Samples: 2

GT 220M 207
Samples: 173

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Palworld	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Palworld	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
Palworld	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld

3−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite	0−1	0−1
Palworld	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 32 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.41	0.50
Recency	2 May 2012	15 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	204 Watt	14 Watt

Quadro 7000 has a 1582% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

GT 220M, on the other hand, has 1357% lower power consumption.

The Quadro 7000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 7000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 220M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVIDIA Quadro K5000

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

GT 520M

NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000

Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 10 votes

Rate Quadro 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.2 103 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220M on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 7000 or GeForce GT 220M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.