Radeon RX 7600S vs Quadro 600

Place in the ranking	1097	143
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.06	no data
Power efficiency	2.39	38.58
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code name	GF108	Navi 33
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 December 2010 (15 years ago)	4 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$179	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	1792
Core clock speed	640 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.24	246.4
Floating-point processing power	0.2458 TFLOPS	15.77 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	64
TMUs	16	112
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28
L0 Cache	no data	448 KB
L1 Cache	128 KB	512 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	2 MB
L3 Cache	no data	32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	2.1	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 600 1.24

RX 7600S 37.50
+2924%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 600 517
Samples: 1945

RX 7600S 15586
+2915%

Samples: 230

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −3267%	101 +3267%
1440p	1−2 −5100%	52 +5100%
4K	0−1	27

Cost per frame, $

1080p	59.67	no data
1440p	179.00	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Palworld	117 +0%	117 +0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	107 +0%	107 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	191 +0%	191 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	103 +0%	103 +0%
Far Cry 5	111 +0%	111 +0%
Fortnite	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Palworld	98 +0%	98 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Valorant	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	127 +0%	127 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	84 +0%	84 +0%
Dota 2	113 +0%	113 +0%
Far Cry 5	107 +0%	107 +0%
Fortnite	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	126 +0%	126 +0%
Metro Exodus	39 +0%	39 +0%
Palworld	72 +0%	72 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	159 +0%	159 +0%
Valorant	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	70 +0%	70 +0%
Dota 2	110 +0%	110 +0%
Far Cry 5	102 +0%	102 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95 +0%	95 +0%
Valorant	179 +0%	179 +0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Palworld	70 +0%	70 +0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	64 +0%	64 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	260−270 +0%	260−270 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	43 +0%	43 +0%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%
Palworld	49 +0%	49 +0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	17 +0%	17 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Palworld	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Valorant	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +0%	18 +0%
Dota 2	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Palworld	25 +0%	25 +0%

This is how Quadro 600 and RX 7600S compete in popular games:

RX 7600S is 3267% faster in 1080p
RX 7600S is 5100% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.24	37.50
Recency	13 December 2010	4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	75 Watt

Quadro 600 has 88% lower power consumption.

RX 7600S, on the other hand, has a 2924% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 567% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600S is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7600S is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Millennium G450 x4 MMS

Tesla T10 Processor

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Quadro FX 380

Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 478 votes

Rate Quadro 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

4.2 258 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 600 or Radeon RX 7600S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.