Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Quadro 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
600 2000 2000D 4000 4000 Mac Edition 5000 6000 Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2050 Tesla M2070 Tesla S2050
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 600 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 600
2010, $179
1 GB DDR3, 40 Watt
1.24

T1200 Mobile outperforms 600 by a whopping 1315% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1103355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.4075.42
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF108TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date13 December 2010 (15 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961024
Core clock speed640 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors585 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate10.2491.20
Floating-point processing power0.2458 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
L1 Cache128 KB1 MB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.17.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−1350%
58
+1350%
1440p2−3
−1550%
33
+1550%
4K5−6
−1520%
81
+1520%

Cost per frame, $

1080p44.75no data
1440p89.50no data
4K35.80no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how Quadro 600 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 1350% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 1550% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 1520% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 45 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.24 17.54
Recency 13 December 2010 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 1315% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233% more advanced lithography process, and 122% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 600 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
GeForce 310M GeForce 310M
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3400 Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
RTX 2060 Super GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
GTX 870M GeForce GTX 870M
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
GT 730 GeForce GT 730
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
FX 5600 Mac Edition Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
RTX 3050 6 GB GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 479 votes

Rate Quadro 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 171 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 600 or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.