GMA 3000 vs Quadro 5000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking692not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.82no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGF100Broadwater
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 July 2010 (16 years ago)1 June 2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed405 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate16.201.600
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs404
L1 Cache640 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1792 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2010 1 June 2006
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 13 Watt

Quadro 5000M has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3000, on the other hand, has 669% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 5000M and GMA 3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GMA 3000 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 47 votes

Rate GMA 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000M or GMA 3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.