GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs Quadro 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5000 with GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 5000
2011, $2,499
2.5 GB GDDR5, 152 Watt
4.71

RTX 5090 Mobile outperforms 5000 by a whopping 1344% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking70022
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Power efficiency2.4055.38
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGF100GB203
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 February 2011 (15 years ago)27 March 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35210496
Core clock speed513 MHz990 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1515 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)152 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate22.57496.9
Floating-point processing power0.7223 TFLOPS31.8 TFLOPS
ROPs40112
TMUs44328
Tensor Coresno data328
Ray Tracing Coresno data82
L1 Cache704 KB10.3 MB
L2 Cache640 KB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2.5 GB24 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth120.0 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA2.012.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 5000 4.71
RTX 5090 Mobile 68.01
+1344%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 5000 1964
Samples: 501
RTX 5090 Mobile 28333
+1343%
Samples: 1305

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−1500%
160
+1500%
1440p7−8
−1371%
103
+1371%
4K4−5
−1500%
64
+1500%

Cost per frame, $

1080p249.90no data
1440p357.00no data
4K624.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Palworld 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 390
+0%
390
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Far Cry 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Palworld 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 301
+0%
301
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Far Cry 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 173
+0%
173
+0%
Metro Exodus 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Palworld 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 404
+0%
404
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Far Cry 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 224
+0%
224
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Palworld 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 224
+0%
224
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 158
+0%
158
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 189
+0%
189
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 179
+0%
179
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 149
+0%
149
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Palworld 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

This is how Quadro 5000 and RTX 5090 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 Mobile is 1500% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 Mobile is 1371% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 Mobile is 1500% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.71 68.01
Recency 23 February 2011 27 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2.5 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 152 Watt 95 Watt

RTX 5090 Mobile has a 1344% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 860% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 5000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 36 votes

Rate Quadro 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 355 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000 or GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.