TITAN RTX vs Quadro 5000 SDI
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 93 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.84 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 12.51 |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | GF100 | TU102 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 February 2011 (15 years ago) | 18 December 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $7,899 | $2,499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 352 | 4608 |
| Core clock speed | 513 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1770 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,100 million | 18,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 172 Watt | 280 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 22.57 | 509.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.7223 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40 | 96 |
| TMUs | 44 | 288 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 576 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB | 6 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | Quad-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2.5 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 750 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDI | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 February 2011 | 18 December 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2.5 GB | 24 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 172 Watt | 280 Watt |
5000 SDI has 63% lower power consumption.
TITAN RTX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 860% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro 5000 SDI and TITAN RTX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro 5000 SDI is a workstation graphics card while TITAN RTX is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
