Radeon Next vs Quadro 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 6.0
GPU code nameGK104Navi 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344no data
Core clock speed797 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate89.26no data
ROPs32no data
TMUs112no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length160 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1782 MBps14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.02 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2.175-
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

Radeon Next has a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 4100 and Radeon Next. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 4100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Next is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 13 votes

Rate Radeon Next on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 4100 or Radeon Next, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.