Radeon HD 7350 PCI vs Quadro 410
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1165 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.05 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.12 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | GK107 | Cedar |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 August 2012 (14 years ago) | 5 January 2012 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 80 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,270 million | 292 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 19 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 11.30 | 5.200 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.2711 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | 4 |
| TMUs | 16 | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
| Length | 176 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 891 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.26 GB/s | 8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | - |
| CUDA | 3.0 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 August 2012 | 5 January 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 19 Watt |
Quadro 410 has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 30% more advanced lithography process.
HD 7350 PCI, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Quadro 410 and Radeon HD 7350 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro 410 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7350 PCI is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
