Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU vs Quadro 4000M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 817 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.16 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.41 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | RDNA 3.5 (2025−2026) |
| GPU code name | GF104 | Strix Point |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 (15 years ago) | 2025 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 336 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2700 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,950 million | 34,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 26.60 | 172.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6384 TFLOPS | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48 |
| TMUs | 56 | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 8 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 16 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x USB Type-C |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 900% more advanced lithography process, and 257% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Quadro 4000M and Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro 4000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
