GeForce GT 430 PCI vs Quadro 2000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking979not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.28no data
Power efficiency2.56no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF106GF108
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 January 2011 (15 years ago)11 October 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$46.56 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19296
Core clock speed550 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rate17.6011.20
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs3216
L1 Cache256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s9.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.12.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 January 2011 11 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 49 Watt

Quadro 2000M has an age advantage of 3 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GT 430 PCI, on the other hand, has 12% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 2000M and GeForce GT 430 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 2000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 430 PCI is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 113 votes

Rate Quadro 2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 14 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 2000M or GeForce GT 430 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.