GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Quadro 2000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro 2000 with GeForce GTX 460 OEM, including specs and performance data.
460 OEM outperforms 2000 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 916 | 843 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.06 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.82 | 1.47 |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | GF106 | GF104 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 24 December 2010 (15 years ago) | 11 October 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 36.40 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.48 TFLOPS | 0.8736 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 |
| TMUs | 32 | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 178 mm | 210 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.26 | 2.86 |
| Recency | 24 December 2010 | 11 October 2010 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 150 Watt |
Quadro 2000 has an age advantage of 2 months, and 142% lower power consumption.
GTX 460 OEM, on the other hand, has a 27% higher aggregate performance score.
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000 in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro 2000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
