Arc 140V Mobile vs Quadro 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking916not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.82no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Xe2-LPG (2024)
GPU code nameGF106Lunar Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date24 December 2010 (15 years ago)24 September 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921024
Core clock speed625 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt37 Watt
Texture fill rate20.00124.8
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3264
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length178 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed650 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 December 2010 24 September 2024
Chip lithography 40 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 37 Watt

Arc 140V Mobile has an age advantage of 13 years, a 1233% more advanced lithography process, and 68% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 2000 and Arc 140V Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 2000 is a workstation graphics card while Arc 140V Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 355 votes

Rate Quadro 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 12 votes

Rate Arc 140V Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 2000 or Arc 140V Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.