GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs P106-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P106-100 with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

P106-100
2017
6 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
16.24
RTX 3070 Ti
2021, $599
8 GB GDDR6X, 290 Watt
55.63
+243%

RTX 3070 Ti outperforms P106-100 by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking36951
Place by popularitynot in top-10079
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.66
Power efficiency10.4714.84
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGP106GA104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 June 2017 (9 years ago)31 May 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12806144
Core clock speed1506 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed1709 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt290 Watt
Texture fill rate136.7339.8
Floating-point processing power4.375 TFLOPS21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs80192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache480 KB6 MB
L2 Cache1536 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length250 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s608.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA6.18.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P106-100 16.24
RTX 3070 Ti 55.63
+243%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P106-100 6764
Samples: 177
RTX 3070 Ti 23175
+243%
Samples: 17075

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
−258%
161
+258%
1440p24−27
−258%
86
+258%
4K16−18
−256%
57
+256%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.72
1440pno data6.97
4Kno data10.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 350
+0%
350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 178
+0%
178
+0%
Palworld 239
+0%
239
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 219
+0%
219
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 337
+0%
337
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 205
+0%
205
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Palworld 219
+0%
219
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 266
+0%
266
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
+0%
124
+0%
Dota 2 249
+0%
249
+0%
Far Cry 5 196
+0%
196
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 173
+0%
173
+0%
Metro Exodus 145
+0%
145
+0%
Palworld 143
+0%
143
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 294
+0%
294
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+0%
113
+0%
Dota 2 230
+0%
230
+0%
Far Cry 5 183
+0%
183
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 144
+0%
144
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Palworld 132
+0%
132
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 160
+0%
160
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 137
+0%
137
+0%
Metro Exodus 89
+0%
89
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
+0%
73
+0%
Far Cry 5 150
+0%
150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 113
+0%
113
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 97
+0%
97
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 47
+0%
47
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 147
+0%
147
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%
Palworld 73
+0%
73
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+0%
109
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35
+0%
35
+0%
Dota 2 194
+0%
194
+0%
Far Cry 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Palworld 54
+0%
54
+0%

This is how P106-100 and RTX 3070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is 258% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 258% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 256% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.24 55.63
Recency 19 June 2017 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 290 Watt

P106-100 has 142% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 243% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the P106-100 in performance tests.

Be aware that P106-100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 415 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 8144 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P106-100 or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.