Arc A310 vs P104-101

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.78
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe-HPG (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP104DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 January 2018 (8 years ago)12 October 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed1506 MHz1750 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1750 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rate269.356.00
Floating-point processing power8.617 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6416
TMUs16032
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L1 Cache960 KB1.1 MB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.3 GB/s124.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA6.1-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2018 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm

Arc A310 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 167% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between P104-101 and Arc A310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that P104-101 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A310 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate P104-101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 315 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P104-101 or Arc A310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.