GeForce GTX 1660 vs P102-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 P104-100 P104-101 P106-090 P106-100 Quadro P6000 P10 P40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1630 1650 1650 GDDR6 1650 SUPER 1650 TU106 1650 TU116 1660 1660 Super 1660 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P102-100 with GeForce GTX 1660, including specs and performance data.

P102-100
2018, $599
5 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
9.18

GTX 1660 outperforms P102-100 by a whopping 204% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P102-100 P102-100
GTX 1660 GTX 1660

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking527232
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0631.21
Power efficiency2.8417.97
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU116
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 February 2018 (8 years ago)14 March 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

GTX 1660 has 2844% better value for money than P102-100.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32001408
Core clock speed1582 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate336.6157.1
Floating-point processing power10.77 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs8048
TMUs20088
L1 Cache1.2 MB1.4 MB
L2 Cache2.5 MB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount5 GB6 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz2001 MHz
Memory bandwidth440.3 GB/s192.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P102-100 9.18
GTX 1660 27.87
+204%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P102-100 3826
Samples: 13
GTX 1660 11610
+203%
Samples: 9414

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

P102-100 63349
+9.4%
GTX 1660 57904

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

P102-100 66856
+19%
GTX 1660 56196

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
−207%
83
+207%
1440p16−18
−213%
50
+213%
4K8−9
−238%
27
+238%

Cost per frame, $

1080p22.19
−741%
2.64
+741%
1440p37.44
−755%
4.38
+755%
4K74.88
−823%
8.11
+823%
  • GTX 1660 has 741% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 has 755% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 has 823% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 271
+0%
271
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+0%
71
+0%
Palworld 82
+0%
82
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 78
+0%
78
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 223
+0%
223
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 132
+0%
132
+0%
Palworld 68
+0%
68
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 306
+0%
306
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+0%
47
+0%
Dota 2 219
+0%
219
+0%
Far Cry 5 92
+0%
92
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 123
+0%
123
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 115
+0%
115
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
Palworld 51
+0%
51
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
+0%
102
+0%
Valorant 287
+0%
287
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Dota 2 197
+0%
197
+0%
Far Cry 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+0%
98
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 115
+0%
115
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Palworld 47
+0%
47
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 52
+0%
52
+0%
Metro Exodus 33
+0%
33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 129
+0%
129
+0%
Valorant 226
+0%
226
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 76
+0%
76
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Palworld 34
+0%
34
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 49
+0%
49
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
Palworld 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%
Valorant 125
+0%
125
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Palworld 17
+0%
17
+0%

This is how P102-100 and GTX 1660 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 is 207% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 is 213% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 is 238% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.18 27.87
Recency 12 February 2018 14 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

GTX 1660 has a 204% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 33% more advanced lithography process, and 108% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 is our recommended choice as it beats the P102-100 in performance tests.

Be aware that P102-100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P102-100 P102 100
vs
T400 4 GB T400 4 GB
GTX 1660 GeForce GTX 1660
vs
RTX 3050 OEM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
P102-100 P102 100
vs
Instinct MI25 Radeon Instinct MI25
R7 M365X R7 M365X
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile
R7 A360 R7 A360
vs
Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU M4 Max 40-Core GPU
P102-100 P102 100
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
P102-100 P102 100
vs
TITAN V CEO Edition TITAN V CEO Edition
P102-100 P102 100
vs
HD Graphics P4700 HD Graphics P4700
P102-100 P102 100
vs
Data Center GPU Flex 140 Data Center GPU Flex 140
P102-100 P102 100
vs
CMP 100HX-210 CMP 100HX-210
R7 350 R7 350
vs
G550 PCIe
RX 580 OEM RX 580 OEM
vs
Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB
Quadro P3200 P3200
vs
RX 540X RX 540X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 41 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6565 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P102-100 or GeForce GTX 1660, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.