GMA vs NVS 5200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11191623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.62no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameGF117Cloverview
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2012 (14 years ago)4 May 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed625 MHz533 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.001.066
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs162
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXMPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.6ES 2.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 5200M 489
+24350%
Samples: 1478
GMA 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Palworld 4−5 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Fortnite 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
Palworld 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Fortnite 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
Metro Exodus 1−2 no data
Palworld 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 no data
Palworld 4−5 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
Valorant 4−5 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data
Palworld 1−2 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 8−9 no data

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2012 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

NVS 5200M has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 5200M and GMA. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 5200M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GMA is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 170 votes

Rate NVS 5200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 12 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 5200M or GMA, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.