A100X vs NVS 510

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1009not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency3.58no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK107GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date23 October 2012 (13 years ago)28 June 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1926912
Core clock speed797 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1440 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate12.75622.1
Floating-point processing power0.306 TFLOPS19.91 TFLOPS
ROPs16160
TMUs16432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache16 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache256 KB80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length160 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB80 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s2,039 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.08.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 28 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 300 Watt

NVS 510 has 757% lower power consumption.

A100X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 510 and A100X. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 79 votes

Rate NVS 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A100X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 510 or A100X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.