ATI Radeon Xpress X1200 vs NVS 3100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1315not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.71no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)no data
GPU code nameGT218RS690M
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)1 February 2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164
Core clock speed606 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data350 MHz
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.848no data
Floating-point processing power0.04698 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed790 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)no data
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 1 February 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 80 nm

NVS 3100M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 3100M and Radeon Xpress X1200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 3100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Xpress X1200 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 158 votes

Rate NVS 3100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 73 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress X1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 3100M or Radeon Xpress X1200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.