GeForce 9100M G vs NVS 3100M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 3100M with GeForce 9100M G, including specs and performance data.

NVS 3100M
2010
512 MB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.49
+145%

3100M outperforms 9100M G by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13141471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.71no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)no data
GPU code nameGT218MCP77MH MCP79MH
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)3 June 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores168
Core clock speed606 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.848no data
Floating-point processing power0.04698 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed790 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)10
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.2-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 3100M 0.49
+145%
9100M G 0.20

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 3100M 204
+146%
Samples: 1518
9100M G 83
Samples: 83

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Valorant 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Palworld 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the NVS 3100M is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • NVS 3100M performs better in 16 tests (64%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (36%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.49 0.20
Recency 7 January 2010 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm

NVS 3100M has a 145% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

The NVS 3100M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100M G in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 3100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 9100M G is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 157 votes

Rate NVS 3100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 3100M or GeForce 9100M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.