Tesla S1070 vs NVS 310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1241not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency2.75no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGF119GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 June 2012 (14 years ago)1 June 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 $7,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48240 ×4
Core clock speed523 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors292 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate4.18448.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.1004 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs432 ×4
TMUs880 ×4
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length156 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed875 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 June 2012 1 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 800 Watt

NVS 310 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 38% more advanced lithography process, and 3900% lower power consumption.

Tesla S1070, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between NVS 310 and Tesla S1070. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 101 votes

Rate NVS 310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 9 votes

Rate Tesla S1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 310 or Tesla S1070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.