GeForce 9300 GS vs NVS 310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 310 with GeForce 9300 GS, including specs and performance data.

NVS 310
2012, $159
512 MB DDR3, 20 Watt
0.71
+196%

NVS 310 outperforms 9300 GS by a whopping 196% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12411443
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency2.75no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF119G98
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date26 June 2012 (14 years ago)1 June 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 $59.95

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores488
Core clock speed523 MHz567 MHz
Number of transistors292 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.1844.536
Floating-point processing power0.1004 TFLOPS0.0224 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length156 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed875 MHz333 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s5.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.11.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 310 0.71
+196%
9300 GS 0.24

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 310 296
+190%
Samples: 421
9300 GS 102
Samples: 42

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 0.24
Recency 26 June 2012 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm

NVS 310 has a 196% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

The NVS 310 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9300 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 310 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9300 GS is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 101 votes

Rate NVS 310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 13 votes

Rate GeForce 9300 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 310 or GeForce 9300 GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.