ATI FireGL V3200 vs NVS 310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1241not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency2.75no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGF119RV380
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 June 2012 (14 years ago)1 September 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed523 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors292 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt46 Watt
Texture fill rate4.1842.000
Floating-point processing power0.1004 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length156 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed875 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s11.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0b
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 June 2012 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 46 Watt

NVS 310 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 130% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between NVS 310 and FireGL V3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 101 votes

Rate NVS 310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 310 or FireGL V3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.