Rubin Ultra GPU vs N1 16SM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameGB20BGR110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 June 2026 (less than a year ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204857344
Core clock speed741 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed2346 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistorsno data670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data3600 Watt
Texture fill rate300.34,062.5
Floating-point processing power9.609 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs2424
TMUs1281792
Tensor Cores641792
Ray Tracing Cores16no data
L1 Cache2 MB112 MB
L2 Cache50 MB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 6.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5XHBM4e
Maximum RAM amount128 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed1067 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth273.2 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/AN/A
Shader ModelN/AN/A
OpenGLN/AN/A
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA12.110.7
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm

Rubin Ultra GPU has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between N1 16SM and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that N1 16SM is a notebook graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate N1 16SM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about N1 16SM or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.