GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4870 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms Mobility HD 4870 by a whopping 1029% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 943 | 275 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 59 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 29.54 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | M98 | GN20-P0-R 6 GB |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 9 January 2009 (17 years ago) | 6 January 2023 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 800 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 1237 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1492 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 956 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP) |
| Texture fill rate | 22.00 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.88 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | no data |
| TMUs | 40 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 96 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 888 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.83 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12_2 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 28
−146%
| 69
+146%
|
| 1440p | 2−3
−1550%
| 33
+1550%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−3175%
|
130−140
+3175%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1925%
|
81
+1925%
|
| Palworld | 6−7
−850%
|
55−60
+850%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 1−2
−5400%
|
55−60
+5400%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−1760%
|
90−95
+1760%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−3175%
|
130−140
+3175%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1500%
|
64
+1500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1600%
|
85
+1600%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
−1189%
|
110−120
+1189%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−745%
|
90−95
+745%
|
| Palworld | 6−7
−850%
|
55−60
+850%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−727%
|
90−95
+727%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−315%
|
160−170
+315%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−1760%
|
90−95
+1760%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−3175%
|
130−140
+3175%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
−520%
|
250−260
+520%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1050%
|
46
+1050%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−450%
|
120−130
+450%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1460%
|
78
+1460%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
−1189%
|
110−120
+1189%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−745%
|
90−95
+745%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
−2200%
|
92
+2200%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−1600%
|
50−55
+1600%
|
| Palworld | 6−7
−850%
|
55−60
+850%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−727%
|
90−95
+727%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−1038%
|
91
+1038%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−315%
|
160−170
+315%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−1760%
|
90−95
+1760%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−875%
|
39
+875%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−450%
|
120−130
+450%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1380%
|
74
+1380%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−745%
|
90−95
+745%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−727%
|
90−95
+727%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−525%
|
50
+525%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−315%
|
160−170
+315%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
−1189%
|
110−120
+1189%
|
| Palworld | 6−7
−850%
|
55−60
+850%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−900%
|
50−55
+900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
−1007%
|
160−170
+1007%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 20−22
−770%
|
170−180
+770%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
−1173%
|
190−200
+1173%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2200%
|
21−24
+2200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−2500%
|
52
+2500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1100%
|
60−65
+1100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−1133%
|
37
+1133%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−1767%
|
55−60
+1767%
|
| Palworld | 3−4
−1000%
|
30−35
+1000%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−187%
|
40−45
+187%
|
| Valorant | 10−11
−1190%
|
120−130
+1190%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 4−5
−1825%
|
75−80
+1825%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−733%
|
24−27
+733%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−733%
|
24−27
+733%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 40
+0%
|
40
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| Palworld | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Palworld | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
This is how ATI Mobility HD 4870 and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 146% faster in 1080p
- RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 1550% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Resident Evil 4 Remake, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 5400% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 3050 6GB Mobile performs better in 52 tests (83%)
- there's a draw in 11 tests (17%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.03 | 22.91 |
| Recency | 9 January 2009 | 6 January 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 8 nm |
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has a 1029% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 588% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
