Radeon R5 M330 vs ATI Mobility HD 4850
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and Radeon R5 M330, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Mobility HD 4850 outperforms R5 M330 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1041 | 1056 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.15 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | M98 | Exo |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 9 January 2009 (17 years ago) | 5 May 2015 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 800 | 320 |
| Compute units | no data | 5 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 955 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1030 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 956 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 18 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.8 TFLOPS | 0.6592 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 8 |
| TMUs | 40 | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 850 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| HD3D | - | + |
| PowerTune | - | + |
| DualGraphics | - | + |
| ZeroCore | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX® 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| Mantle | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 41
+356%
| 9 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Fortnite | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| Valorant | 35−40
+2.8%
|
35−40 |
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35
+3.1%
|
30−35 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Dota 2 | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Fortnite | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Metro Exodus | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8 |
| Valorant | 35−40
+2.8%
|
35−40 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Dota 2 | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8 |
| Valorant | 35−40
+2.8%
|
35−40 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 5−6 | 5−6 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Valorant | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11 |
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3 | 2−3 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3 | 2−3 |
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Valorant | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9 |
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3 | 2−3 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3 | 2−3 |
This is how ATI Mobility HD 4850 and R5 M330 compete in popular games:
- ATI Mobility HD 4850 is 356% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 4850 is 100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- ATI Mobility HD 4850 performs better in 10 tests (22%)
- there's a draw in 35 tests (78%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.50 | 1.42 |
| Recency | 9 January 2009 | 5 May 2015 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 28 nm |
ATI Mobility HD 4850 has a 6% higher aggregate performance score.
R5 M330, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 49% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and Radeon R5 M330.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
