Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4830 and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 4830
2009
1 GB GDDR5
1.30

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU outperforms Mobility HD 4830 by a whopping 748% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1081475
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)no data
GPU code nameM97Panther Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 March 2009 (17 years ago)5 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64032
Core clock speed550 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2450 MHz
Number of transistors826 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nmno data
Texture fill rate17.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.704 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed700 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)no data
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−933%
31
+933%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Palworld 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
−4800%
45−50
+4800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Fortnite 4−5
−1550%
65−70
+1550%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−586%
45−50
+586%
Palworld 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Valorant 30−35
−206%
100−110
+206%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
−4800%
45−50
+4800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
−440%
160−170
+440%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Dota 2 16−18
−724%
140−150
+724%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Fortnite 4−5
−1550%
65−70
+1550%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−586%
45−50
+586%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 37
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Palworld 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−314%
27−30
+314%
Valorant 30−35
−206%
100−110
+206%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
−4800%
45−50
+4800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Dota 2 16−18
−724%
140−150
+724%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−586%
45−50
+586%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−314%
27−30
+314%
Valorant 30−35
−718%
270−280
+718%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−1550%
65−70
+1550%
Palworld 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−833%
80−85
+833%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−746%
110−120
+746%
Valorant 5−6
−2120%
110−120
+2120%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 9−10
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Palworld 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Valorant 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Counter-Strike 2 59
+0%
59
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4830 and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 933% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 4800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU performs better in 41 tests (73%)
  • there's a draw in 15 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.30 11.03
Recency 3 March 2009 5 January 2026

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU has a 748% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 16 years.

The Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4830 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4830 or Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.