RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4670 with RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4670
2009
512 MB GDDR3, 35 Watt
1.10
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
2025
24 GB GDDR7, 95 Watt
42.14
+3731%

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms Mobility HD 4670 by a whopping 3731% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1140105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.4334.32
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameM96GB203
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date9 January 2009 (17 years ago)19 March 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32010496
Core clock speed675 MHz990 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistors514 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60551.0
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPS35.27 TFLOPS
ROPs8112
TMUs32328
Tensor Coresno data328
Ray Tracing Coresno data82
L1 Cache64 KB10.3 MB
L2 Cache128 KB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount512 MB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−4150%
170
+4150%
1440p3−4
−3867%
119
+3867%
4K2−3
−4100%
84
+4100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Palworld 4−5
−2775%
110−120
+2775%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−13400%
130−140
+13400%
Fortnite 2−3
−9000%
180−190
+9000%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2229%
160−170
+2229%
Palworld 4−5
−2775%
110−120
+2775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1700%
160−170
+1700%
Valorant 30−35
−656%
240−250
+656%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 140−150
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−930%
270−280
+930%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Dota 2 14−16
−3567%
550−600
+3567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−13400%
130−140
+13400%
Fortnite 2−3
−9000%
180−190
+9000%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2229%
160−170
+2229%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−10200%
100−110
+10200%
Palworld 4−5
−2775%
110−120
+2775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1700%
160−170
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2157%
150−160
+2157%
Valorant 30−35
−656%
240−250
+656%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Dota 2 14−16
−3567%
550−600
+3567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−13400%
130−140
+13400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2229%
160−170
+2229%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1700%
160−170
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2157%
150−160
+2157%
Valorant 30−35
−3650%
1200−1250
+3650%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−9000%
180−190
+9000%
Palworld 4−5
−2775%
110−120
+2775%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3600%
110−120
+3600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−3650%
450−500
+3650%
Valorant 3−4
−9067%
270−280
+9067%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 50−55
Far Cry 5 0−1 100−110
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−6100%
120−130
+6100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−11300%
110−120
+11300%
Palworld 1−2
−6500%
65−70
+6500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1020%
168
+1020%
Valorant 7−8
−3614%
260−270
+3614%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2750%
55−60
+2750%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160
+0%
160
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 138
+0%
138
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4670 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 4150% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 3867% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 4100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 13400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile performs better in 37 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.10 42.14
Recency 9 January 2009 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 4670 has 171% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3731% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 14 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4670 or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.