Quadro NVS 110M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4670 with Quadro NVS 110M, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4670
2009
512 MB GDDR3, 35 Watt
1.10
+900%

Mobility HD 4670 outperforms 110M by a whopping 900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11401524
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.430.85
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameM96G72
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date9 January 2009 (17 years ago)1 June 2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3207
Core clock speed675 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data300 MHz
Number of transistors514 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate21.601.200
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs324
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s4.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Palworld 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Palworld 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Palworld 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Palworld 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Valorant 3−4 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Palworld 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 4670 is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 4670 performs better in 24 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.10 0.11
Recency 9 January 2009 1 June 2006
Chip lithography 55 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 4670 has a 900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 64% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 110M, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 110M in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro NVS 110M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 14 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4670 or Quadro NVS 110M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.