Radeon HD 6450A vs ATI Mobility HD 3870

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3870 and Radeon HD 6450A, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 3870
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 55 Watt
1.23
+98.4%

Mobility HD 3870 outperforms HD 6450A by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11071279
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.741.93
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameM88Caicos
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2008 (18 years ago)7 April 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320160
Core clock speed660 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors666 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate10.565.000
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS0.2 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs168
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz533 MHz
Memory bandwidth54.4 GB/s8.528 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+125%
4−5
Valorant 35−40
+119%
16−18

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+107%
14−16
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
Dota 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
Far Cry 6 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+125%
4−5
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+133%
3−4
Valorant 35−40
+119%
16−18

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
Dota 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+125%
4−5
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+133%
3−4
Valorant 35−40
+119%
16−18

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+100%
4−5
Far Cry 6 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+117%
6−7
Valorant 8−9
+100%
4−5

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2

4K
High

Far Cry 6 5−6
+150%
2−3
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+114%
7−8
Valorant 8−9
+100%
4−5

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 0.62
Recency 4 June 2008 7 April 2011
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 25 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3870 has a 98% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 6450A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 27% more advanced lithography process, and 55% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6450A in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3870 or Radeon HD 6450A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.