GeForce 9400 GT vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3650 with GeForce 9400 GT, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 3650
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 30 Watt
0.34

9400 GT outperforms Mobility HD 3650 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13751325
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.880.73
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameM86G96C
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2008 (18 years ago)27 August 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12016
Core clock speed500 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors378 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate4.0004.400
Floating-point processing power0.12 TFLOPS0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cache128 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Valorant 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Valorant 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Valorant 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Valorant 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.47
Recency 7 January 2008 27 August 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 50 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3650 has 67% lower power consumption.

9400 GT, on the other hand, has a 38% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 months.

The GeForce 9400 GT is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9400 GT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 42 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 536 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3650 or GeForce 9400 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.