UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3400 3410 3430 3450 3470 3470 Hybrid X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
G1 G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G1 32EU Mobile G4 G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) G4 48EU Mobile G7 G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) G7 64EU Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3470 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 3470
2008
256 MB DDR2, 12 Watt
0.22
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
2019
12 Watt
2.87
+1205%

Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) outperforms Mobility HD 3470 by a whopping 1205% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI Mobility HD 3470 Mobility HD 3470
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1458837
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.428.88
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameM82Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2008 (18 years ago)28 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4032
Core clock speed680 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors181 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate2.720no data
Floating-point processing power0.0544 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR4
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−113
4K0−19

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 6−7
Palworld 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 6−7
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Palworld 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Valorant 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−150%
30
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 6−7
Dota 2 9−10
−144%
22
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Palworld 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−100%
10
+100%
Valorant 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 6−7
Dota 2 9−10
−122%
20
+122%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 7−8
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

1440p
Epic

Palworld 0−1 4−5

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4
+0%
4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+0%
7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2
+0%
2
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 1200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) performs better in 23 tests (48%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.22 2.87
Recency 7 January 2008 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has a 1205% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3470 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI Mobility HD 3470 Mobility Radeon HD 3470
vs
ION LE ION LE
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
ATI Mobility HD 3470 Mobility Radeon HD 3470
vs
GeForce 9400M GeForce 9400M
GeForce 410M 410M
vs
RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q
HD 6370M HD 6370M
vs
ATI Mobility X1400 Mobility X1400
ATI Mobility HD 4570 Mobility HD 4570
vs
Radeon 880M 880M
ATI Mobility HD 4530 Mobility HD 4530
vs
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
ATI Mobility HD 4530 Mobility HD 4530
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
ATI Mobility HD 3470 Mobility HD 3470
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
8400M G 8400M G
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4200 GeForce4 Ti 4200
Go 7400 Go 7400
vs
GTX 1630 GTX 1630
Pro WX 7100 Pro WX 7100
vs
GeForce MX250 MX250

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 63 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 406 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3470 or UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.