GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated251
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data71.37
Power efficiencyno data28.48
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRC300GA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2003 (23 years ago)2 February 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32304
Core clock speed300 MHz1042 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz1470 MHz
Number of transistors76 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rate0.6105.8
Floating-point processing powerno data6.774 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs272
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18
L1 Cacheno data2.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2003 2 February 2024
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 6 GB has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP and GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 3797 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP or GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.