RTX A500 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility FireGL V5700 with RTX A500, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
2008
512 MB GDDR3
0.34

RTX A500 outperforms Mobility V5700 by a whopping 4521% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1378381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.26
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameM86GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date7 January 2008 (18 years ago)10 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1202048
Core clock speed600 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors378 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data60 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800113.3
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Palworld 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Palworld 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Valorant 24−27
−4500%
1150−1200
+4500%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−4186%
600−650
+4186%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Dota 2 10−11
−4400%
450−500
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Palworld 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4400%
270−280
+4400%
Valorant 24−27
−4500%
1150−1200
+4500%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Dota 2 10−11
−4400%
450−500
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4400%
270−280
+4400%
Valorant 24−27
−4500%
1150−1200
+4500%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

1440p
Epic

Palworld 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−4233%
650−700
+4233%
Valorant 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 15.71
Recency 7 January 2008 10 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm

RTX A500 has a 4521% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 588% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility FireGL V5700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility FireGL V5700 is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobility FireGL V5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 170 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility FireGL V5700 or RTX A500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.