Tesla X2090 vs Matrox Parhelia DL256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureParhelia (2002−2006)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameParhelia-512GF110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2003 (23 years ago)25 July 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed200 MHz651 MHz
Number of transistors80 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20041.66
Floating-point processing powerno data1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs1664
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCI-XPCIe 2.0 x16
Length190 mmno data
Width1-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MBps924 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s177.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH60No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 40 nm

Tesla X2090 has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Matrox Parhelia DL256 and Tesla X2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Matrox Parhelia DL256 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla X2090 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Parhelia DL256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 14 votes

Rate Tesla X2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Matrox Parhelia DL256 or Tesla X2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.