RTX A40 vs Jetson Nano GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM20BGA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateMarch 2019 (7 years ago)5 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12810752
Core clock speed640 MHz1305 MHz
Boost clock speed921 MHz1755 MHz
Number of transistors2,000 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology20 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate14.74589.7
Floating-point processing power0.2358 TFLOPS37.74 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs16336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84
L1 Cache48 KB10.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1812 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data695.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.11.2
CUDA5.38.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 20 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 300 Watt

Jetson Nano GPU has 2900% lower power consumption.

RTX A40, on the other hand, has a 150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Jetson Nano GPU and RTX A40. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Jetson Nano GPU is a notebook graphics card while RTX A40 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 20 votes

Rate Jetson Nano GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 404 votes

Rate RTX A40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Jetson Nano GPU or RTX A40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.