Moore Threads MTT S80 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 with Moore Threads MTT S80, including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020
9.62
+65%

Graphics G7 outperforms Moore Threads MTT S80 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking508656
Place by popularity20not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.77
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)MUSA 2nd Gen (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeChunxiao
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (6 years ago)11 November 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores964096
Core clock speedno data1800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data22.0 billion
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data255 Watt
Texture fill rateno data460.8
ROPsno data256
TMUsno data256
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Fortnite 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Valorant 90−95
+65.5%
55−60
−65.5%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+71.8%
85−90
−71.8%
Dota 2 70−75
+75%
40−45
−75%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Fortnite 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Valorant 90−95
+65.5%
55−60
−65.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Dota 2 70−75
+75%
40−45
−75%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+85%
40−45
−85%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Valorant 95−100
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Valorant 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Dota 2 35−40
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.62 5.83
Recency 15 August 2020 11 November 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 has a 65% higher aggregate performance score.

Moore Threads MTT S80, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Moore Threads MTT S80 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while Moore Threads MTT S80 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 3329 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 15 votes

Rate Moore Threads MTT S80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 or Moore Threads MTT S80, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.