RTX A400 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Pro Graphics P6300 with RTX A400, including specs and performance data.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300
2014
15 Watt
3.82

RTX A400 outperforms Pro Graphics P6300 by a whopping 276% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking769407
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.7022.23
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eGA107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 September 2014 (11 years ago)16 April 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed300 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1762 MHz
Number of transistors189 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate38.4042.29
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs616
TMUs4824
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 3.82
RTX A400 14.37
+276%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 1591
Samples: 21
RTX A400 5986
+276%
Samples: 676

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.82 14.37
Recency 5 September 2014 16 April 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 233% lower power consumption.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has a 276% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop graphics card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 16 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 55 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics P6300 or RTX A400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.