Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking769not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.70no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3eTU106
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date5 September 2014 (11 years ago)27 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841920
Core clock speed300 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors189 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40165.6
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs664
TMUs48120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cacheno data1.9 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.801.2
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 433% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 16 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics P6300 or Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.