GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms Pro Graphics P580 by a whopping 456% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 694 | 241 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 25.01 | 18.13 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Skylake GT4e | TU106 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 (10 years ago) | 29 January 2019 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 576 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | 10,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm+ | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 144.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.21 TFLOPS | 4.608 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 9 | 48 |
| TMUs | 72 | 120 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 240 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 30 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 3 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 336.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 18−20
−478%
| 104
+478%
|
| 1440p | 10−12
−560%
| 66
+560%
|
| 4K | 7−8
−500%
| 42
+500%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
−600%
|
150−160
+600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
−510%
|
60−65
+510%
|
| Palworld | 12−14
−475%
|
65−70
+475%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 8−9
−738%
|
65−70
+738%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−420%
|
104
+420%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
−600%
|
150−160
+600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
−510%
|
60−65
+510%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−540%
|
96
+540%
|
| Fortnite | 27−30
−459%
|
162
+459%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−370%
|
108
+370%
|
| Palworld | 12−14
−475%
|
65−70
+475%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−800%
|
171
+800%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
−272%
|
223
+272%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−420%
|
104
+420%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
−600%
|
150−160
+600%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 80−85
−220%
|
260−270
+220%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
−510%
|
60−65
+510%
|
| Dota 2 | 40−45
−181%
|
118
+181%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−507%
|
91
+507%
|
| Fortnite | 27−30
−397%
|
144
+397%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−365%
|
107
+365%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−463%
|
90
+463%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
−522%
|
56
+522%
|
| Palworld | 12−14
−475%
|
65−70
+475%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−674%
|
147
+674%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−693%
|
111
+693%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
−227%
|
196
+227%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−390%
|
98
+390%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
−510%
|
60−65
+510%
|
| Dota 2 | 40−45
−167%
|
112
+167%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−460%
|
84
+460%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−283%
|
88
+283%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−489%
|
112
+489%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−329%
|
60
+329%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
−105%
|
123
+105%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 27−30
−290%
|
113
+290%
|
| Palworld | 12−14
−475%
|
65−70
+475%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−578%
|
60−65
+578%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 35−40
−422%
|
190−200
+422%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
−1200%
|
50−55
+1200%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−1067%
|
35
+1067%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−386%
|
170−180
+386%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−333%
|
212
+333%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−1775%
|
75
+1775%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−833%
|
27−30
+833%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−600%
|
63
+600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−555%
|
70−75
+555%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−667%
|
45−50
+667%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
−722%
|
74
+722%
|
| Palworld | 7−8
−457%
|
35−40
+457%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−231%
|
50−55
+231%
|
| Palworld | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−3800%
|
39
+3800%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−714%
|
171
+714%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−2000%
|
42
+2000%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1100%
|
12−14
+1100%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−412%
|
87
+412%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−725%
|
33
+725%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−586%
|
45−50
+586%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
−660%
|
38
+660%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 5−6
−580%
|
34
+580%
|
| Palworld | 0−1 | 21−24 |
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
This is how Iris Pro Graphics P580 and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 2060 Mobile is 478% faster in 1080p
- RTX 2060 Mobile is 560% faster in 1440p
- RTX 2060 Mobile is 500% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 3800% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 2060 Mobile performs better in 60 tests (95%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.85 | 26.95 |
| Recency | 1 September 2015 | 29 January 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has a 967% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 667% lower power consumption.
RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 456% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P580 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
