GeForce 8800 GTS 112 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking720not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.80no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameSkylake GT4eG80
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)19 November 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores576112
Core clock speed350 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate68.4028.00
Floating-point processing power1.094 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs920
TMUs7228
L2 Cacheno data80 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 GB640 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 19 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 640 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics 580 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 10140% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 543% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 18 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 310 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics 580 or GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.