GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking849not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.30no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3eGP108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 May 2013 (13 years ago)12 March 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speed200 MHz1152 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1379 MHz
Number of transistors392 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0033.10
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS1.059 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs4024
L1 Cacheno data144 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem shared + 128 MB eDRAMDDR4
Maximum RAM amountSystem shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1050 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2013 12 March 2018
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 20 Watt

GT 1030 DDR4 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 57% more advanced lithography process, and 125% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce GT 1030 DDR4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 190 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1349 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or GeForce GT 1030 DDR4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.