GeForce 9800 GTX vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Pro Graphics 5200 with GeForce 9800 GTX, including specs and performance data.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013
System shared System shared + 128 MB eDRAM, 45 Watt
2.83
+53%

Pro Graphics 5200 outperforms 9800 GTX by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking849974
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.09
Power efficiency7.301.02
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3eG92
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 May 2013 (13 years ago)28 March 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320128
Core clock speed200 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt140 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate48.0043.20
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS0.4321 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs4064
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem shared + 128 MB eDRAMGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1100 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data70.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentHDTVDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-Via Adapter
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.32.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 2.83
+53%
9800 GTX 1.85

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1177
+53.1%
Samples: 537
9800 GTX 769
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+80%
10−12
−80%
4K7
+75%
4−5
−75%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data29.90
4Kno data74.75

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Palworld 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Fortnite 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Palworld 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Valorant 45−50
+66.7%
27−30
−66.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 52
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Fortnite 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Palworld 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Valorant 45−50
+66.7%
27−30
−66.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Valorant 45−50
+66.7%
27−30
−66.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Palworld 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Valorant 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Palworld 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Valorant 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

This is how Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 9800 GTX compete in popular games:

  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is 80% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is 75% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.83 1.85
Recency 27 May 2013 28 March 2008
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 140 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has a 53% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 195% more advanced lithography process, and 211% lower power consumption.

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9800 GTX is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 190 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 236 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or GeForce 9800 GTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.