GRID K100 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking849not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.30no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3eGK107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 May 2013 (13 years ago)28 June 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$63

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320192
Core clock speed200 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0013.60
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS0.3264 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs4016
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem shared + 128 MB eDRAMDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared891 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.51 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2013 28 June 2013
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 130 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has a 27% more advanced lithography process, and 189% lower power consumption.

GRID K100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GRID K100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a notebook graphics card while GRID K100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 190 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or GRID K100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.