Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking742not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.35no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)TrueGPU (2026)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT3e7G106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 April 2018 (8 years ago)18 June 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846144
Core clock speed300 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate50.40384.0
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS24.58 TFLOPS
ROPs696
TMUs48192
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data294 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2018 18 June 2026
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 1400% lower power consumption.

Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and LX 7G100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a notebook graphics card while Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 373 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 655 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 14 votes

Rate LX 7G100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics 655 or LX 7G100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.