GeForce 7100 + nForce 630i vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking743not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.31no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT3eC73
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 April 2018 (8 years ago)4 October 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate50.401.200
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPSno data
ROPs62
TMUs482

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2018 4 October 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

Iris Plus Graphics 655 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and GeForce 7100 + nForce 630i. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 7100 + nForce 630i is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 373 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 655 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 29 votes

Rate GeForce 7100 nForce 630i on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics 655 or GeForce 7100 + nForce 630i, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.