GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs Iris Graphics 5100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking986not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.54no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3GK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 May 2013 (13 years ago)13 September 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320960
Core clock speed200 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1032 MHz
Number of transistors1,300 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate44.0082.56
Floating-point processing power0.704 TFLOPS1.981 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs4080
L1 Cacheno data80 KB
L2 Cacheno data384 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data144.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2013 13 September 2014
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 140 Watt

Iris Graphics 5100 has a 27% more advanced lithography process, and 367% lower power consumption.

GTX 660 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Iris Graphics 5100 and GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Graphics 5100 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 142 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 52 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Graphics 5100 or GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.